LogFAQs > #904297428

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, Database 3 ( 02.21.2018-07.23.2018 ), DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Seriously. Do you think Trump will win a second term?
Herugrim 07/01/18 11:55:27 AM #69:	legendary_zell posted... J E S U S posted... legendary_zell posted... J E S U S posted... The democrats will have learned nothing and will go for another diversity candidate over the most qualified. Ensuring 4 more years of trump WTF is this other than blatant sexism? The problem with Hillary was certainly not her qualifications and Trump had no government experience of any kind and it shows through his incompetence at actually being a chief executive or getting legislation passed. Hillary was in no way a diversity candidate. It seems like "most qualified" for you means a white male as it does for many. Im not just talking about job qualifications. All around as a candidate. They pushed her because she was a woman and made that the entire reason to vote for her. She was not a good Secretary of State and incredibly unlikeable, but the glass ceiling had to be broken. You put the best candidate out there regardless of race and sex. But there you go, going straight for the racism/sexism card. This is why trump will win 2020 She was the most popular candidate with the widest support. She had the highest qualifications, money, name recognition, etc. She had a detailed platform and never herself relied solely on the fact that she's a woman. That's a myth created by right wingers and Bernie bros. Not to mention she actually received the most votes. She was considered a pretty okay SOS by anyone who wasn't duped by Benghazi trash. Calling her a diversity candidate when she was A US senator, first lady, and SOS, as well as a Yale law graduate, is sexist AF regardless of your "you called me out for my assholery, I'll vote for Trump " rhetoric. Stop playing the victim when your bad behavior is identified. Her entire platform was "You have to elect me, I'm a woman!" She wasn't selling her experience and her history is actually part of what sank her. The Clinton Foundation has deep roots in the system and is another blatant example of the corruption it represents. Just the way her Super Delegates came around and bumped Bernie was enough to prove that she was as apart of the system as anyone. A big part of the reason so many people voted for Trump is because they didn't want to vote for Hillary. Not because she's a woman, but because she's a part of the system. Trump will definitely win again if they go to bat with Hillary again. And the way the Blue Wave has already crashed because the Left can't stop eating itself, he's got a good chance anyway. You can't attack the first and second amendment and expect the majority of Americans to support you. Evidence: https://nyti.ms/2ID0Wov --- John Watson: "Well it isn't obvious to me." Sherlock Holmes: "The world is full of obvious things that nobody notices." <cite>Herugrim posted [p:904297428] in Seriously.... [t:76767000]...</cite> <quote><cite>legendary_zell posted...</cite> <quote><cite>J E S U S posted...</cite> <quote><cite>legendary_zell posted...</cite> <quote><cite>J E S U S posted...</cite> <quote>The democrats will have learned nothing and will go for another diversity candidate over the most qualified. Ensuring 4 more years of trump</quote> WTF is this other than blatant sexism? The problem with Hillary was certainly not her qualifications and Trump had no government experience of any kind and it shows through his incompetence at actually being a chief executive or getting legislation passed. Hillary was in no way a diversity candidate. It seems like "most qualified" for you means a white male as it does for many.</quote> Im not just talking about job qualifications. All around as a candidate. They pushed her because she was a woman and made that the entire reason to vote for her. She was not a good Secretary of State and incredibly unlikeable, but the glass ceiling had to be broken. You put the best candidate out there regardless of race and sex. But there you go, going straight for the racism/sexism card. This is why trump will win 2020</quote> She was the most popular candidate with the widest support. She had the highest qualifications, money, name recognition, etc. She had a detailed platform and never herself relied solely on the fact that she's a woman. That's a myth created by right wingers and Bernie bros. Not to mention she actually received the most votes. She was considered a pretty okay SOS by anyone who wasn't duped by Benghazi trash. Calling her a diversity candidate when she was A US senator, first lady, and SOS, as well as a Yale law graduate, is sexist AF regardless of your "you called me out for my assholery, I'll vote for Trump " rhetoric. Stop playing the victim when your bad behavior is identified.</quote> Her entire platform was "You have to elect me, I'm a woman!" She wasn't selling her experience and her history is actually part of what sank her. The Clinton Foundation has deep roots in the system and is another blatant example of the corruption it represents. Just the way her Super Delegates came around and bumped Bernie was enough to prove that she was as apart of the system as anyone. A big part of the reason so many people voted for Trump is because they didn't want to vote for Hillary. Not because she's a woman, but because she's a part of the system. Trump will definitely win again if they go to bat with Hillary again. And the way the Blue Wave has already crashed because the Left can't stop eating itself, he's got a good chance anyway. You can't attack the first and second amendment and expect the majority of Americans to support you. Evidence: https://nyti.ms/2ID0Wov --- John Watson: "Well it isn't obvious to me." Sherlock Holmes: "The world is full of obvious things that nobody notices."</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1