LogFAQs > #904278851

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, Database 3 ( 02.21.2018-07.23.2018 ), DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear
Topic List
Page List: 1
TopicWhy -calories in < calories out- is not a good way to look at fat loss.
orcus_snake
07/01/18 12:26:52 AM
#20:


Perascamin posted...
Dragonblade01 posted...
"CICO works really well if you also make other good decisions about diet."

So in other words it's not just CICO. Nobody should be telling people to just do CICO as a diet.

Yes, there are people who don't try as hard as they should. Yes, there are people who make excuses. Yes, the number of people with serious medical conditions that effect weight gain/loss is far fewer than the number of people who could lose weight if they put in more effort and made smarter decisions.

But none of that changes the fact that it is not as simple as CICO.

For probably 70% of people in the world, it really is.


nonono the number I pulled out of my ass says it is closer to 73.42443% :P
---
"Warwick are you jungling"
"No I'm standing by the wolves because I miss my family"
... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List
Page List: 1