LogFAQs > #904120453

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, Database 3 ( 02.21.2018-07.23.2018 ), DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Democrats should forbid Trump from choosing Kennedy's replacement
Darkman124 06/28/18 10:42:36 AM #43:	GregShmedley posted... No, it was for all executive nominations, minus SC judges. The 2017 rule change eliminated the SC being the exception. appreciate the correction. know that i was aware dems had changed part of the rules. had forgotten it was also for all other executive nominations. trend remains towards a full removal of the filibuster next time the dems take congress. it's a good setup, too, because then the ping-pong "we invalidate everything you did!" practice can be blamed on democrats. --- And when the hourglass has run out, eternity asks you about only one thing: whether you have lived in despair or not. <cite>Darkman124 posted [p:904120453] in Democrats ... [t:76755617]...</cite> <quote><cite>GregShmedley posted...</cite> <quote>No, it was for all executive nominations, minus SC judges. The 2017 rule change eliminated the SC being the exception. </quote> appreciate the correction. know that i was aware dems had changed part of the rules. had forgotten it was also for all other executive nominations. trend remains towards a full removal of the filibuster next time the dems take congress. it's a good setup, too, because then the ping-pong "we invalidate everything you did!" practice can be blamed on democrats. --- And when the hourglass has run out, eternity asks you about only one thing: whether you have lived in despair or not.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1