LogFAQs > #904078743

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, Database 3 ( 02.21.2018-07.23.2018 ), DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	With Supreme Court Justice Kennedy Gone, Abortion and Gay Rights Are Next
BWLurker2 06/27/18 5:29:17 PM #185:	DarkTransient posted... Okay, y'kno. I am 100% on board with banning abortion (very strictly with an exception if the mother's life is in danger otherwise - I would choose "fully legal" over "that exception doesn't exist", despite absolutely hating the idea of it being legal). The rest of this post is not addressing abortion specifically. Just the way they're going about trying to make that change. But in general, the fact that THAT is how the American system needs to work - pass illegal laws, to get them challenged up to Supreme Court level, and retroactively legalized - does that not indicate that the system is, y'kno, kinda really messed up in general? So being on board like this, once the child is born, are you supportive of the mother getting aid if she needs it? <cite>BWLurker2 posted [p:904078743] in With Supre... [t:76755858]...</cite> <quote><cite>DarkTransient posted...</cite> <quote>Okay, y'kno. I am 100% on board with banning abortion (very strictly with an exception if the mother's life is in danger otherwise - I would choose "fully legal" over "that exception doesn't exist", despite absolutely hating the idea of it being legal). The rest of this post is not addressing abortion specifically. Just the way they're going about trying to make that change. But in general, the fact that THAT is how the American system needs to work - pass illegal laws, to get them challenged up to Supreme Court level, and retroactively legalized - does that not indicate that the system is, y'kno, kinda really messed up in general?</quote> So being on board like this, once the child is born, are you supportive of the mother getting aid if she needs it?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1