LogFAQs > #903907051

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, Database 3 ( 02.21.2018-07.23.2018 ), DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear
Topic List
Page List: 1
TopicNintendo is not a top tier game developer. Not by a long shot...
LockeMonster
06/24/18 11:34:11 PM
#116:


Unknown5uspect posted...
But you can't give any specific examples which is what was asked of you hours ago.

I asked you to respond in detail rebuting my argument and you ignored me. I asked you several questions for further clarification so I can respond.

I'm not saying these games are of poor quality or cheap like that Hoth alt keeps insisting and trolling over.

I'm saying they can definitely be so much more, but the company philosophy does not allow them to go too much further with it. So they stick to what's safe and familiar. Me, TC and many others would like more even if what we get right now is satisfactory.

That one of TC's point. And the examples I listed of them being cheap as a company are there to provide evidence to the eventual question of "how do you figure Nintendo is a cheap company?"

Because they do these things that even the competitions do not and are always lagging behind with everything, yet they are worth as much as Sony, who has a way more on their plate.

The rebuttals I'm getting are the same ones from the 90s. Basically that gameplay > everything, which is such an outdated argument.
---
"Scranton is great, but New York is like Scranton on acid. No, on speed. Nah. On steroids."
FC: 3282-3258-0224
... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List
Page List: 1