LogFAQs > #903674662

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, Database 3 ( 02.21.2018-07.23.2018 ), DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Trump punks out, flips to sign executive order to stop family separations.
DifferentialEquation 06/21/18 1:29:29 AM #28:	iPhone_7 posted... Capn Circus posted... The zero tolerance policy is his "own administration's policy". I'm a bit confused by what you're implying. To me it appears an EO had to be issued to allow children and parents to be detained together. Please tell me exactly why that is not the case, as you seem to allege. https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/attorney-general-announces-zero-tolerance-policy-criminal-illegal-entry An executive order wasnt required for them to start a zero tolerance policy. An executive order wasnt needed to have a policy of not separating children from their new parents. This was intentional and it backfired BIGLY SAD! The way the already existing law is written is that if you want hold the parents in custody while you investigate their case then you cannot keep them together with their kids. You would have to release them into the U.S. and hope that they actually return for their hearing when they're supposed to and don't just flee to a sanctuary city. --- There's no business to be taxed. <cite>DifferentialEquation posted [p:903674662] in Trump punk... [t:76734092]...</cite> <quote><cite>iPhone_7 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Capn Circus posted...</cite> <quote>The zero tolerance policy is his "own administration's policy". I'm a bit confused by what you're implying. To me it appears an EO had to be issued to allow children and parents to be detained together. Please tell me exactly why that is not the case, as you seem to allege.</quote> https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/attorney-general-announces-zero-tolerance-policy-criminal-illegal-entry An executive order wasnt required for them to start a zero tolerance policy. An executive order wasnt needed to have a policy of not separating children from their new parents. This was intentional and it backfired BIGLY SAD!</quote> The way the already existing law is written is that if you want hold the parents in custody while you investigate their case then you cannot keep them together with their kids. You would have to release them into the U.S. and hope that they actually return for their hearing when they're supposed to and don't just flee to a sanctuary city. --- There's no business to be taxed.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1