Topic List | Page List: 1 |
---|---|
Topic | The digital age sucks |
Darkrobotisback 06/20/18 6:26:58 PM #17: | Dash_Harber posted... Darkrobotisback posted...For a robot to replace human beings in terms of employment. It has to be able to accomplish its task without failure. If a robot fails it's task, or somehow ends up damage or destroyed in process of engaging its task... 1. If a large/small business corporation wants to be successful. They need skilled employees that are capable of accomplishing everyday task(s). Even low level/entry level jobs at said corporation requires the task to be accomplished, otherwise who'll maintain the site from sustaining property damage, prevent it from accumulating garbage, etc? ^no matter how "menial" or "labor intensive" those jobs are. Most companies will want to the task done at the lowest cost/cost efficient way possible. Why would they have a ~$500-$1,000 robot accomplish basic task(s), when they can hire someone that may be "nearly as skilled as the machine" and pay them at minimum wage salary (if not a bit more)? 2. And as time passes robots become obsolete, and the parts to refurbish/repair them become harder to find 3. Read bullet 1. --- ... Copied to Clipboard! |
Topic List | Page List: 1 |