LogFAQs > #903494798

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, Database 3 ( 02.21.2018-07.23.2018 ), DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	USC rules against voters in Wisconsin gerrymandering case
CyricZ 06/18/18 11:03:01 AM #9:	TomNook20 posted... Darkman124 posted... Looks like gerrymandering will be around to stay until a few more conservative justices have "heart attacks." The court also ruled against Republican voters in Maryland who claimed they were unfairly put at a disadvantage by Democrats. Fair. Gerrymandering still sucks. EDIT: Darkman124 posted... yes, however it is the conservative justices who wrote the majority opinion, and the liberal justices who dissented. Oops never mind. Looks like conservatives are willing to take a hit if it means keeping gerrymandering the standard. --- CyricZ <cite>CyricZ posted [p:903494798] in USC rules ... [t:76726212]...</cite> <quote><cite>TomNook20 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Darkman124 posted...</cite> <quote>Looks like gerrymandering will be around to stay until a few more conservative justices have "heart attacks."</quote> <quote>The court also ruled against Republican voters in Maryland who claimed they were unfairly put at a disadvantage by Democrats.</quote></quote> Fair. Gerrymandering still sucks. EDIT: <cite>Darkman124 posted...</cite> <quote>yes, however it is the conservative justices who wrote the majority opinion, and the liberal justices who dissented.</quote> Oops never mind. Looks like conservatives are willing to take a hit if it means keeping gerrymandering the standard. --- CyricZ</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1