TheVipaGTS posted... Howl posted...
CanuckCowboy posted...
TheVipaGTS posted...
UnfairRepresent posted...
Man liberals won't know who to side with on this one.
i was going to respond seriously to this topic but then you went and ruined it before it even started with that line. good job.
Well technically the OP was wrong. They chose the anti-christian racist over the Christian black man itt. I guess being a Christian means that he has more privelege than the business owner who is a racist in their opinion. The oppression hierarchy gets complicated sometimes but I'm glad we have experts in the field of CE like Vipa and STM, to tell us all what our opinions should be on these complicated issues.
but this really had nothing to do with him being black on paper. The policy in itself could be viewed as a racist policy but you people bitch and moan anytime people make stuff like this about race...now you're ok with doing that since "TEH LIBERALS"...Y'all really need to grow up.
I like how you felt the inherent need to qualify your opening statement with
on paper because even when you're attempting to outright deny that a situation has to do with race, your own ideology won't allow you to do so. It really shows alot about how you are conflicted about your own stance on this issue because we rightfully pointed out the exact same logic you use to attack similar situations.
---
Posted with GameRaven 3.5
... Copied to Clipboard!