One, because being discriminated against for being trans is steeped in upholding stereotypes solely on the basis of sex
Or two, because sex and gender ARE the same thing and Gavin is a male, man, etc regardless of his genitalis configuration at any point in his life
Wtf does that 2nd part mean? You mean his biological sex is that of the opposite sex that he was born as?
Yes, he's a man and his sex is male. Chromosomes arent the end all be all. Gonadal dysgenesis births have been recorded, the most reported on one took place in 2015, I believe.
This is the most ridiculously stupid argument I've ever seen made here. "His" objective sex is female. What you are arguing is scientifically false. You're literally just making shit up because the judge made an obviously irrational assertion and you're attempting extremely poorly to defend it.
When presented with verified cases that prove there's need for a nuanced approach to sex, you say it's stupid.
Have you karyotyped and phenotyped Gavin? Can you even prove that he has XX chromosomes? Assume HIPAA doesn't exist, of course.
You are literally the only person I've ever seen make an argument favoring transgenders that has said sex and gender are the same thing. The existence of gender dysphoria alone disproves your argument entirely and is literally defined as identifying as a gender different than ones biological sex.
you have it all wrong, gender dysphoria has to do with anatomical layouts of things, presentation factors in as well but you clearly don't understand what the heck gender dysphoria actually is.
You clearly do not know what sex, gender, or gender dysphoria actually are. ---