LogFAQs > #902672239

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, Database 3 ( 02.21.2018-07.23.2018 ), DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	turns out Jordan Peterson is an awful therapist too
COVxy 06/06/18 6:54:57 PM #73:	Romes187 posted... COVxy posted... s0nicfan posted... He's not an expert in every field, and that leads to things like the infamous lobster analogy But it's not argued as an analogy. He's literally trying to argue certain things work in certain ways in humans because they work in lobsters that way. But the argument is extremely flawed and shallow. His lobster argument is simply to show that dominance hierarchies are older than humans and clearly not brought about by "the patriarchy" Seems strange to devote an entire chapter to standing up straight in relation to lobster physiology and serotonin then. --- =E[(x-E[x])(y-E[y])] <cite>COVxy posted [p:902672239] in turns out ... [t:76676150]...</cite> <quote><cite>Romes187 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>COVxy posted...</cite> <quote><cite>s0nicfan posted...</cite> <quote>He's not an expert in every field, and that leads to things like the infamous lobster analogy</quote> But it's not argued as an analogy. He's literally trying to argue certain things work in certain ways in humans because they work in lobsters that way. But the argument is extremely flawed and shallow.</quote> His lobster argument is simply to show that dominance hierarchies are older than humans and clearly not brought about by "the patriarchy"</quote> Seems strange to devote an entire chapter to standing up straight in relation to lobster physiology and serotonin then. --- =E[(x-E[x])(y-E[y])]</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1