LogFAQs > #902489407

Darkrobotisback posted...

But you sabotaged the bike to the point where it could kill him.
You could of locked the bike in a way that posed no harm to another person(s), but you've decided to impose a mechanism that defies the bikes safety mechanism and you've also recorded him getting injured/killed.
Therefore you have full knowledge of incident and the court of the law will see you as the perpetrator behind said persons death/or injury.

1) If you are a CRIMINAL (e.g. Bicycle Thief), the safety of the Criminal isn't my concern or liability, EVER!!!
2) There is no "Guaranteed Safety Mechanism" to a Bicycle when it comes to a simple ROPE / Chain attached to the Bicycle. It's how you are SUPPOSED to lock a Bicycle up.
3) The law / Jury wouldn't see me as a perpetrator since I'm not expecting people to steal my Bicycle.
If I choose to allow somebody to use my Bicycle, I would disable all restraints.
But since I didn't allow said Thief, that's on them to figure out how to steal my Bicycle.
I have ZERO Obligation to make the Bicycle Easy to Steal / Safe for them to steal, PERIOD!!!

It's people like you who allow criminality to prosper, you are a ally of all criminals as far as I'm concerned.

What next, allow rapists to more easily rape their victims?

Poor Women was raped but the Rapist was hit with the Anti-Rape condom and is suing for injury to his penis.

That sounds like a topic you would love to defend!
---

Are you a MexiCAN or a MexiCAN'T - Johnny Depp 'Once Upon A Time in Mexico'