LogFAQs > #902208229

Mr Lasastryke posted...

Corrik posted...

I am not ignoring you. I just don't agree it is definitive. I think you can take it that way if you wish to. You obviously wish to. I don't see it as definitive.

but why?

saying "i don't see it as definitive" repeatedly is not an argument.

I think there is moving parts on that comment and motives in regards to it.

I think he specifically was just trying to get a more sympathetic judge or instill the thought of bias in order for an appeal in a case he thought he could lose with that judge.

I do not think he said you are a fucking Mexican your kind isn't able to oversee court cases. He was specifically pointing to a bias with it.

Like I said, he is likely wrong about the bias due to heritage. If anything most court bias is from political party which does say something about our court system.

But, I do not think he was saying he was incapable on an ability level to see a case. I think he was just referring to bias. Saying a person could be biased isn't a racist comment.

For example, if I say a Mexican woman would be biased in thinking that illegal mexican immigrants should be granted amnesty. I think that is an assessment that is able to be made without being racist, whether true or not.

We see situations like this in sports. A college basketball administrator has to recuse himself in the selection process regarding his school due to bias.

Granted the weird part about this is that this is in reference to his own comments prior. It isn't the situation I initially thought I remembered about it being about immigration. But, end of the day. Racism should be cut and dry. It shouldn't be need to be explained or be debatable. I wouldn't call a single one of you a racist without concrete clandestine proof of it. Nor would I call Trump it.
---

LoL ID = imajericho
XBL GT = Corrik