LogFAQs > #902086579

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, Database 3 ( 02.21.2018-07.23.2018 ), DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Phoenix Wright Mafia: Topic 3: Look, a Ladder!
foolm0r0n 05/27/18 7:32:37 PM #90:	Oops posted in the wrong topic I'm curious about Chris' claim that he totally thinks Prof is scum and has been attacking him this whole time, so I went back to analyze his reactions to Prof. He initially jumped on Prof as the 5th vote after Prof made a somewhat bad but not really post about Zam's claim (1.369). He made a really big deal out of it even though Prof's reaction wasn't too bad This reeks of a scumbud voting another scumbud for doing something mildly stupid but not really that bad. People had already started a train on Prof at that point, but Chris never said anything about Prof at all before 1.369. But when he saw the train building speed he found a BS reason to jump on. 2.4 DoomTheGyarados posted... Anyone in the house want to defend Deadpool? 2.135 DoomTheGyarados posted... Prof is awful on tone (my vote reasoning) but I notice people who are gathering momentum are people who can't defend themselves well. If we keep going after those it is like 28% or whatever success rate randomly. Possible bad means scum, puns is right about that, but exerting pressure on people who make sound arguments is a really good idea day one to make better players work for their safety even as town - it increases the fluidity of the game. This is all he said about Prof after his vote. First post is extremely passive. He doesn't want to offer up any arguments against Prof himself, even though he is "totes scum"?? In the next post he outright defends Prof as "bad, not scum". Even though the post that made him vote for Prof was just bad, not scummy at all. Next he jumped off to Han in 2.262 the instant everyone else started laying off pressure. The reason was because Han attacked Scare, who just made his "big case" against Chris. Scare is rightfully wary about this sudden support in 282. This is especially weird because Chris likely thinks Scare is scum. He doesn't think the bad play in this game is scum, which means the scum is playing well. He highlighted Scare and Red specifically as good players with his backhanded "scum Chris" comment. Defending Scare against Han in 262 gives him good favor with a town-telling person, makes him seem less scummy for working with someone who is attacking him, and most importantly, gives him a reason to jump off Prof. DYL in 323 agrees that Chris' votes for Prof and Han seemed reactionary and weak. After that he jumped off Han onto me very easily. He later mentioned how Han is passive today, which is true and why I really want Han to talk. But he might just be gone or something (forum mafia sux). Still, he is not on Han OR on Prof. He is on me. This is not an indication that he thinks Prof is scum and should die. tl;dr No matter what Chris says, I'm treating him as a Prof defender --- _foolmo_ 2 + 2 = 4 <cite>foolm0r0n posted [p:902086579] in Phoenix Wr... [t:76649063]...</cite> <quote>Oops posted in the wrong topic I'm curious about Chris' claim that he totally thinks Prof is scum and has been attacking him this whole time, so I went back to analyze his reactions to Prof. He initially jumped on Prof as the 5th vote after Prof made a somewhat bad but not really post about Zam's claim (1.369). He made a really big deal out of it even though Prof's reaction wasn't too bad This reeks of a scumbud voting another scumbud for doing something mildly stupid but not really that bad. People had already started a train on Prof at that point, but Chris never said anything about Prof at all before 1.369. But when he saw the train building speed he found a BS reason to jump on. <cite>2.4 DoomTheGyarados posted...</cite> <quote>Anyone in the house want to defend Deadpool? </quote> <cite>2.135 DoomTheGyarados posted...</cite> <quote>Prof is awful on tone (my vote reasoning) but I notice people who are gathering momentum are people who can't defend themselves well. If we keep going after those it is like 28% or whatever success rate randomly. Possible bad means scum, puns is right about that, but exerting pressure on people who make sound arguments is a really good idea day one to make better players work for their safety even as town - it increases the fluidity of the game. </quote> This is all he said about Prof after his vote. First post is extremely passive. He doesn't want to offer up any arguments against Prof himself, even though he is "totes scum"?? In the next post he outright defends Prof as "bad, not scum". Even though the post that made him vote for Prof was just bad, not scummy at all. Next he jumped off to Han in 2.262 the instant everyone else started laying off pressure. The reason was because Han attacked Scare, who just made his "big case" against Chris. Scare is rightfully wary about this sudden support in 282. This is especially weird because Chris likely thinks Scare is scum. He doesn't think the bad play in this game is scum, which means the scum is playing well. He highlighted Scare and Red specifically as good players with his backhanded "scum Chris" comment. Defending Scare against Han in 262 gives him good favor with a town-telling person, makes him seem less scummy for working with someone who is attacking him, and most importantly, gives him a reason to jump off Prof. DYL in 323 agrees that Chris' votes for Prof and Han seemed reactionary and weak. After that he jumped off Han onto me very easily. He later mentioned how Han is passive today, which is true and why I really want Han to talk. But he might just be gone or something (forum mafia sux). Still, he is not on Han OR on Prof. He is on me. This is not an indication that he thinks Prof is scum and should die. tl;dr No matter what Chris says, I'm treating him as a Prof defender --- _foolmo_ 2 + 2 = 4</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1