LogFAQs > #901938283

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, Database 3 ( 02.21.2018-07.23.2018 ), DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear
Topic List
Page List: 1
TopicPolitics Containment Topic 176: The Trump White House is Sunk For Sure This Time
Corrik
05/24/18 9:54:52 PM
#230:


Inviso posted...
Corrik posted...
Jakyl25 posted...
Corrik posted...

Jakyl, if global warming was 100% proven, and we were willing to sacrifice economic output to try and combat it but no other countries actually were willing to outside of words, what kind of action would you support our country taking in regards to it?


Given that its our literal existence as a species at stake, I would support every helpful regulation possible, and HIGHLY positively incentivize businesses to go green with tax breaks to offset expenses.

The money can come from the military.

This is a strange hypothetical though since many other nations are taking the threat more seriously than we are.

So you are saying you support sacrificing our economy and stability for other countries and potentially letting our country fall from it's position in order to do something that will not matter without everyone on board?


No, he's saying we sacrifice our economy and stability for OUR country.

Pollution doesn't localize. Moving pollution from one area to another doesn't make global warming go away if it is caused by man-made production.
---
LoL ID = imajericho
XBL GT = Corrik
... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List
Page List: 1