LogFAQs > #901918144

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, Database 3 ( 02.21.2018-07.23.2018 ), DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	'work requirement' = 'spend more money to cover fewer people'
Questionmarktarius 05/24/18 3:32:55 PM #13:	Balrog0 posted... tennisdude818 posted... If the bureaucracy makes it not worth the effort, Im in favor of just slashing welfare in general, preferably to zero (over time). Yes, that is exactly my point. The 'requirement to work' satisfies a desire to kick people off the program, without the people voting for it having to admit that is the goal. Thank you. Unfortunately, the only effective way to counter the "lack of compassion" argument is to go straight for righteous indignation. <cite>Questionmarktarius posted [p:901918144] in 'work requ... [t:76639099]...</cite> <quote><cite>Balrog0 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>tennisdude818 posted...</cite> <quote>If the bureaucracy makes it not worth the effort, Im in favor of just slashing welfare in general, preferably to zero (over time).</quote> Yes, that is exactly my point. The 'requirement to work' satisfies a desire to kick people off the program, without the people voting for it having to admit that is the goal. Thank you.</quote> Unfortunately, the only effective way to counter the "lack of compassion" argument is to go straight for righteous indignation.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1