LogFAQs > #901695925

The problem was that his points were just flat out incorrect, especially his "You shouldn't disobey me because then God will torture you in hell when you die." one. And he went on with his opposition to religious thinking, which filled out the definition of an argument.

And his odd statement of "I don't like what you say so stop talking about it!"? I have no clue where he got that from. He honestly has no clue about Christianity, so I told him to stop talking about it like he did. When he said "People by the billions are raised all over the world and have been for centuries that if they do wrong, they will suffer. If they do good, they will be rewarded.", that is true (although billions might be an exaggeration). But that isn't the Christian belief, which is why I told him to stop speaking for Christianity, as that's not its teachings.

In short, he started talking about how he doesn't like religious thinking, and I was talking about how he was wrong because not all religions think that way. But then he said that the religion that I know did do that, even though he doesn't know much, if anything about it apparently.

And of course, there's the fact that he just flat out lied about not bringing up religion here. I really want to see what he says about that.
---

( ^_^)/\(^_^ )
Maya high five!