LogFAQs > #901152150

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, Database 3 ( 02.21.2018-07.23.2018 ), DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	All-Purpose Wrestling Topic 444: The Figure 444 Topic
Solioxrz362 05/11/18 1:45:02 AM #349:	scarletspeed7 posted... If you want to pretend that nuance matters, than you are doing something WWE has never done because WWE doesn't believe in nuance. Maybe they should start doing that then because I think it's pretty important. scarletspeed7 posted... WWE considers all of its television as filler designed to be infomercials for its PPVs. And now, with the changes in investor presentation, that's not even true. WWE itself is a product with no drive currently Having the TV shows as infomercials for the PPVs is fine as long as the PPVs pay off creatively. Now imagine if you had no infomercials for the PPVs. What exactly are you doing on the PPVs? Who is gonna care about them? UFC didn't just have McGregor show up for the fights. They had promotional events all in-between. They can't do just 3 times a year either. There's always promotion happening between the fights. So if you want to compare those two, I'll say you're actually wrong about UFC proving your point that intervals don't matter. I have to finish up an application for a college program now so I won't be able to continue discussing this point but I definitely think you're missing a lot of things and you're making some connections that aren't as simple as you think they are. WWE is hard to compare to a lot of the other things you're comparing them to, just because they have some similarities doesn't mean they are essentially the same in function. And sometimes if you can compare them, the similarities actually show that something like WWE does rely on timing a lot more than you think. --- Got a brand new blues that I can't explain <cite>Solioxrz362 posted [p:901152150] in All-Purpos... [t:76586997]...</cite> <quote><cite>scarletspeed7 posted...</cite> <quote> If you want to pretend that nuance matters, than you are doing something WWE has never done because WWE doesn't believe in nuance.</quote> Maybe they should start doing that then because I think it's pretty important. <cite>scarletspeed7 posted...</cite> <quote>WWE considers all of its television as filler designed to be infomercials for its PPVs. And now, with the changes in investor presentation, that's not even true. WWE itself is a product with no drive currently</quote> Having the TV shows as infomercials for the PPVs is fine as long as the PPVs pay off creatively. Now imagine if you had no infomercials for the PPVs. What exactly are you doing on the PPVs? Who is gonna care about them? UFC didn't just have McGregor show up for the fights. They had promotional events all in-between. They can't do just 3 times a year either. There's always promotion happening between the fights. So if you want to compare those two, I'll say you're actually wrong about UFC proving your point that intervals don't matter. I have to finish up an application for a college program now so I won't be able to continue discussing this point but I definitely think you're missing a lot of things and you're making some connections that aren't as simple as you think they are. WWE is hard to compare to a lot of the other things you're comparing them to, just because they have some similarities doesn't mean they are essentially the same in function. And sometimes if you can compare them, the similarities actually show that something like WWE does rely on timing a lot more than you think. --- Got a brand new blues that I can't explain</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1