LogFAQs > #900839827

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, Database 3 ( 02.21.2018-07.23.2018 ), DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear
Topic List
Page List: 1
TopicIowa governor and human being signs fetal 'heartbeat bill' into law
DifferentialEquation
05/05/18 12:25:32 PM
#107:


SomeonesAlt posted...
DifferentialEquation posted...
UnfairRepresent posted...
tennisdude818 posted...
My body, my choice, your wallet feminists: You should either be forced to pay for my abortions and birth control, or you should be forced to pay my bills after I give birth.

It'll cost tax payers more to have more unwanted babies and miserable parents than it will to have legal abortions dude


When you use this justification, you're then essentially allowing people to make ransom demands of the taxpayers.

"You better pay for my birth control, or I'll just be irresponsible and have kids which will cost you even more money!" is really no different than "You better give me $100,000 or I'll go around and vandalize and destroy things which will cost you even more to repair!"

The same question to you:

Is it abortion you're against or it being funded by taxpayers money?


At the very least, I'm against abortion after a certain point in the pregnancy. I don't know that this law is the appropriate one.

However, with the way liberals have been trying to gun grab lately, I'll support any abortion ban purely as a retaliatory measure.
---
There's no business to be taxed.
... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List
Page List: 1