LogFAQs > #900214352

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, Database 3 ( 02.21.2018-07.23.2018 ), DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	It's weird to think that in 2017, a Mario game had better graphics than Zelda
Shuto-uke 04/24/18 10:39:17 AM #49:	Darmik posted... I think it depends really. The blowing grass, lighting, day/night cycles and the weather/elements system is stuff that's not really in Odyssey and a lot of that really adds a lot to the visuals in BOTW. I think Zelda is more of a technical showcase than Odyssey if that makes sense. Yes. They're focusing on resource intensive features that are impressive from a technical standpoint, but that won't wow visually unless you know what to look for. Other games can be more wow worthy wihout being that technically impressive <cite>Shuto-uke posted [p:900214352] in It's weird... [t:76544072]...</cite> <quote><cite>Darmik posted...</cite> <quote>I think it depends really. The blowing grass, lighting, day/night cycles and the weather/elements system is stuff that's not really in Odyssey and a lot of that really adds a lot to the visuals in BOTW. I think Zelda is more of a technical showcase than Odyssey if that makes sense.</quote> Yes. They're focusing on resource intensive features that are impressive from a technical standpoint, but that won't wow visually unless you know what to look for. Other games can be more wow worthy wihout being that technically impressive</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1