LogFAQs > #899857254

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, Database 3 ( 02.21.2018-07.23.2018 ), DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Man, the 360 was such a good console.
Darmik 04/18/18 1:41:56 AM #17:	SpiralDrift posted... I read somewhere that a lot of the multi-platform games were optimized for 360 and then lazily ported to PS3, which meant the 360 versions ran better even with the weaker hardware. Anyone know if there's any truth to this? It's not that the ports were lazy it's more that the PS3 had needlessly complicated architecture for developers. 360 was like developing for PC. PS3 was weirdo Japan shit that continued on from the PS2. As the generation went on and they got more familiar with the PS3 the ports improved. But this was seriously like 4+ years after the PS3 launched. --- Kind Regards, Darmik <cite>Darmik posted [p:899857254] in Man, the 3... [t:76527442]...</cite> <quote><cite>SpiralDrift posted...</cite> <quote>I read somewhere that a lot of the multi-platform games were optimized for 360 and then lazily ported to PS3, which meant the 360 versions ran better even with the weaker hardware. Anyone know if there's any truth to this?</quote> It's not that the ports were lazy it's more that the PS3 had needlessly complicated architecture for developers. 360 was like developing for PC. PS3 was weirdo Japan shit that continued on from the PS2. As the generation went on and they got more familiar with the PS3 the ports improved. But this was seriously like 4+ years after the PS3 launched. --- Kind Regards, Darmik</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1