LogFAQs > #899671951

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, Database 3 ( 02.21.2018-07.23.2018 ), DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	I had two black guys arrested for loitering at the starbucks I work at
145 04/14/18 10:45:03 PM #26:	BlueScum posted... 145 posted... Zikten posted... they were going to order if you had just waited. they wanted their friend to get there. the friend even got there as the cops were arresting them. you have no patience i don't need to give a reason to kick people out because it's still private property. If i suspect someone is a non paying customer, i don't need to give them any reason to kick them out. If they don't want to leave, then i will get the police to intervene. them waiting for their friend before they intend to pay is not a valid excuse because the initial indication is that they were non paying customers to begin with. And even if it was a VALID excuse(them waiting for a friend), it doesn't matter at that point because as a staff member representing a privately owned business, i don't need to give ANY reasons at all for refusing service or for telling ppl to leave. Loitering isn't allowed, deal with it https://twitter.com/Starbucks/status/985200942030012416 Have they fired your ass yet? fired for what? let due process take its course obviously, starbucks does not want any form of controversy that may disparage their franchise. But it doesn't specifically addressed what really happened in that specific incident. That's why there is due process those two black guys are presumed innocent until proven guilty. --- DSP would he a sexy MFer if he worked on his looks -DeadlyNinjaBees- <cite>145 posted [p:899671951] in I had two ... [t:76517967]...</cite> <quote><cite>BlueScum posted...</cite> <quote><cite>145 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Zikten posted...</cite> <quote>they were going to order if you had just waited. they wanted their friend to get there. the friend even got there as the cops were arresting them. you have no patience</quote> i don't need to give a reason to kick people out because it's still private property. If i suspect someone is a non paying customer, i don't need to give them any reason to kick them out. If they don't want to leave, then i will get the police to intervene. them waiting for their friend before they intend to pay is not a valid excuse because the initial indication is that they were non paying customers to begin with. And even if it was a VALID excuse(them waiting for a friend), it doesn't matter at that point because as a staff member representing a privately owned business, i don't need to give ANY reasons at all for refusing service or for telling ppl to leave. Loitering isn't allowed, deal with it</quote> https://twitter.com/Starbucks/status/985200942030012416 Have they fired your ass yet?</quote> fired for what? let due process take its course obviously, starbucks does not want any form of controversy that may disparage their franchise. But it doesn't specifically addressed what really happened in that specific incident. That's why there is due process those two black guys are presumed innocent until proven guilty. --- DSP would he a sexy MFer if he worked on his looks -DeadlyNinjaBees-</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1