LogFAQs > #899074693

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, Database 3 ( 02.21.2018-07.23.2018 ), DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear
Topic List
Page List: 1
TopicAttn: Ruler of Olympus
SteamedHams
04/04/18 9:51:12 PM
#94:


There's nothing "natural" about it other than the fact men can more easily have children at an older age than women... but that's kind of a moot point if you aren't planning to have children. I'd also say it's probably more "natural" for men to have kids in their 20's and early 30's, which is the same age the women you'd have kids with could be. Of course, I'd argue that what's "natural" in a relationship doesn't really make much sense to begin with since we as humans have the ability to make choices about our sex lives beyond basic instincts.

It's fine if you don't want to get involved with divorcees and single moms, but that's it's own issue, and it sounds instead like you just prefer younger women as a rule. I think it's pretty sexist that you don't want to deal with the "baggage" of aging, for somebody close in age to you, but it's okay, and maybe even expected, for women to tolerate guys who are significantly older.
... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List
Page List: 1