LogFAQs > #898863742

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, Database 3 ( 02.21.2018-07.23.2018 ), DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear
Topic List
Page List: 1
TopicYet to hear a compelling argument that the AR-15 is necessary for home defense
DifferentialEquation
04/01/18 7:29:36 AM
#124:


darkjedilink posted...
RoboLaserGandhi posted...
The AR-15 doesn't have to justify its existence to the law, the law has to justify its banning of it.

And that's their problem - even without the Second Amendment, they can't. Their hateboner for it comes from its color and composite stock.

Even the AR-15 body count can't justify a ban, so long as teens with cellphones drive.


They don't need justifications for their legislation. Don't forget about this.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_Assault_Weapons_Ban

A pistol grip or bayonet lug could literally make the difference between something being an "assault weapon" and not being one

Right now, no one who values the second amendment should feel complacent about it.
---
There's no business to be taxed.
... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List
Page List: 1