LogFAQs > #898621262

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, Database 3 ( 02.21.2018-07.23.2018 ), DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear
Topic List
Page List: 1
TopicI honestly don't understand supporting pre-pubescent transgenderism
_Rinku_
03/27/18 11:54:15 PM
#48:


Kaname_Madoka posted...
_Rinku_ posted...
Kanaya413 posted...
I think it would be okay to let them pass socially (clothes, pronouns)
But as someone who went through gender dysphoria for many years myself and ended up cis I do think its better to wait for hormones until they're at least 16
Just my opinion though

Are you including puberty blockers in that? Because by age 16, puberty has done its irreversible damage to most people.

im trans but theres so much wrong with what you're saying here

1) blockers cause osteoporosis (not sure of spelling sorry) when used without HRT

2) puberty doesnt end until far beyond 16 the vast majority of time

1) [Citation Needed], and don't link me something that only says that it may lead to lower bone density.

2) Never said it ended at 16, did I? But a lot of the irreversible changes (like girls getting DD breasts and boys voices dropping an octave or two) happen by then.
... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List
Page List: 1