LogFAQs > #898229284

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, Database 3 ( 02.21.2018-07.23.2018 ), DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Lord of the Rings questions... spoilers
Awakened_Link 03/21/18 3:50:31 PM #34:	Southernfatman posted... Also all that unneeded Arwen crap just takes away from Eowyn anyway. Well already have her as the badass female and Galadriel also to a lesser extent. Jackson and Co. did a lot of things right, but we shouldn't ignore the dumb stuff he did either regardless if it was an adaptation. Movie-Arwen's role was largely reduced after Fellowship. She didn't really do much other than have prophetic visions and telepathic communications with Aragorn. And flashbacks. Plus Eowyn was introduced as kick-ass female pretty much right at the beginning of Two Towers. --- NNID: awakened_link37 \| Add me on Miitomo! Twitter: @awakened_link Formerly known as Coleby <cite>Awakened_Link posted [p:898229284] in Lord of th... [t:76428234]...</cite> <quote><cite>Southernfatman posted...</cite> <quote>Also all that unneeded Arwen crap just takes away from Eowyn anyway. Well already have her as the badass female and Galadriel also to a lesser extent. Jackson and Co. did a lot of things right, but we shouldn't ignore the dumb stuff he did either regardless if it was an adaptation.</quote> Movie-Arwen's role was largely reduced after Fellowship. She didn't really do much other than have prophetic visions and telepathic communications with Aragorn. And flashbacks. Plus Eowyn was introduced as kick-ass female pretty much right at the beginning of Two Towers. --- NNID: awakened_link37 \| Add me on Miitomo! Twitter: @awakened_link Formerly known as Coleby</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1