LogFAQs > #897753335

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, Database 3 ( 02.21.2018-07.23.2018 ), DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Michael Jackson or The Beetles
MabusIncarnate 03/13/18 9:31:53 PM #26:	robellr13 posted... MabusIncarnate posted... Not to mention it took MJ like 40 years to sell half of the albums that The Beatles had released in a span of 10 years. They literally double him up in overall record sales, which accounts for fans and popularity globally. But yeah, it's "not even close" clearly.. Who needs facts and numbers though. Probably because they are white idk and MJ was selling in era where blacks were oppressed. Could have impacted album sales. That's a fair point, but he was only black for the first part of his career. --- Ten million dollars on a losing campaign Twenty million starving and writhing in pain <cite>MabusIncarnate posted [p:897753335] in Michael Ja... [t:76411879]...</cite> <quote><cite>robellr13 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>MabusIncarnate posted...</cite> <quote>Not to mention it took MJ like 40 years to sell half of the albums that The Beatles had released in a span of 10 years. They literally double him up in overall record sales, which accounts for fans and popularity globally. But yeah, it's "not even close" clearly.. Who needs facts and numbers though.</quote> Probably because they are white idk and MJ was selling in era where blacks were oppressed. Could have impacted album sales.</quote> That's a fair point, but he was only black for the first part of his career. --- Ten million dollars on a losing campaign Twenty million starving and writhing in pain</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1