LogFAQs > #897309931

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, Database 3 ( 02.21.2018-07.23.2018 ), DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Agnosticism is a cop out, "agnosticism" doesn't exist
Dragonblade01 03/06/18 10:26:45 PM #114:	ImTheMacheteGuy posted... That is disgustingly oversimplified though and fails to even define god. Being an atheist is simple. It's the theist's job to define the god of their claim. Dustin1280 posted... Dragonblade01 posted... What do you mean when you say that something is "possible"? In my example? That either of those two things could very well be true as there is no evidence that would lead me to believe otherwise. If there's no evidence for either claim, why do you need to believe anything? <cite>Dragonblade01 posted [p:897309931] in Agnosticis... [t:76379394]...</cite> <quote><cite>ImTheMacheteGuy posted...</cite> <quote>That is disgustingly oversimplified though and fails to even define god.</quote> Being an atheist is simple. It's the theist's job to define the god of their claim. <cite>Dustin1280 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Dragonblade01 posted...</cite> <quote>What do you mean when you say that something is "possible"?</quote> In my example? That either of those two things could very well be true as there is no evidence that would lead me to believe otherwise.</quote> If there's no evidence for either claim, why do you need to believe anything?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1