LogFAQs > #897165375

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, Database 3 ( 02.21.2018-07.23.2018 ), DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear
Topic List
Page List: 1
TopicAgnosticism is a cop out, "agnosticism" doesn't exist
Smashingpmkns
03/04/18 2:44:15 PM
#67:


Dustin1280 posted...
Smashingpmkns posted...
Dustin1280 posted...
A deists point of view is no more outlandish then an atheists point of view.

Both are 100% plausible given what we know.


Eh I don't agree. At this point we can say anything is no more outlandish than whatever.

I would actually argue a theists point of view is far more outlandish than an atheist.

But the fact of the matter is we don't know enough about how we came to be to make an educated decision either way.

How is the big bang theory any more likely then what a deist would believe? They are both based on massive theoretical WHAT IFS


I think the path of discovery is important here. Deists propose that events are explained through antecedent causes and scientists in general do the exact opposite because that's not how science or rational thought works.
---
Posted with GameRaven 3.4
... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List
Page List: 1