LogFAQs > #897156491

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, Database 3 ( 02.21.2018-07.23.2018 ), DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Agnosticism is a cop out, "agnosticism" doesn't exist
Dragonblade01 03/04/18 11:38:13 AM #36:	ThyCorndog posted... Dragonblade01 posted... There are only three positions someone can take on any claim "x." 1) X is true 2) X is not true 3) X's truth value is unknown except 3) is true for everyone because we're in the same boat. everyone is agnostic, so I always found it a pointless thing to say. it just comes down to whether you believe in a god (or gods or spiritual forces or whatever) or not. It's ok to say you do or don't. none of us know if any of it is true I was talking about the stances one could take, not dealing with the issue of whether or not we truly know something. A person could say they don't know or they could say it is not true. An atheist could take either stance. <cite>Dragonblade01 posted [p:897156491] in Agnosticis... [t:76379394]...</cite> <quote><cite>ThyCorndog posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Dragonblade01 posted...</cite> <quote>There are only three positions someone can take on any claim "x." 1) X is true 2) X is not true 3) X's truth value is unknown</quote> except 3) is true for everyone because we're in the same boat. everyone is agnostic, so I always found it a pointless thing to say. it just comes down to whether you believe in a god (or gods or spiritual forces or whatever) or not. It's ok to say you do or don't. none of us know if any of it is true</quote> I was talking about the stances one could take, not dealing with the issue of whether or not we truly know something. A person could say they don't know or they could say it is not true. An atheist could take either stance.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1