Lol, first attempt at making an analogy and failing miserably. Good try though with your utterly falacious comparison.
Explain how my analogy is a failure
Because knowing whether or not a soup is not supposed to have flys or fecal matter in it is a simple non-ambiguous issue. Knowing whether or not a police killing is justifiable is a complex issue that requires more than just a glance.
Sometimes it requires literal teams of higly knowlegeable expert investigators years of debate and inquiry to reach a consensus about a particular incident, if one can even be reached at all. It takes no actual training to identify instantly that a bowl of soup isn't supposed to have flys in it.
I don't think it takes that much to tell that killing someone is bad. That's something we teach children in elementary school
I think it takes a lot considering the entirety of society has granted law enforcement the right to kill people in justifiable manners. But keep pretending all cops who kill people are bad.
Not all of them. Just the ones who kill those that aren't trying to kill them. Self defense is valid. Preemptive killing is not.
Lol a guy pointing a gun at a police officer or someone else and a cop shooting that person before that person has a chance to fire absolutely is valid.
If a police officer approached my car pointing a gun at me, would you think it valid that I defend myself? Or do you think this only applies in reverse ---