LogFAQs > #896339544

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, Database 2 ( 09.16.2017-02.21.2018 ), DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Am I even attractive?
masticatingman 02/18/18 9:10:46 PM #39:	Very_Unreliable posted... masticatingman posted... Very_Unreliable posted... masticatingman posted... Well, I could have just said no like other posters. I said 3-4, which is the same as saying below average. I gave plenty of positive takeaways too. No you condemned him to a 3, which I'd reserve for some pretty mortally ugly people. 1-3 is generally agreed upon to be ugly...4-6 is avg...7-10 is attractive... I wouldn't say this guy is categorically ugly, then again I'm a straight guy. Nothing wrong with saying your opinion but I'm disagreeing and I think it's harsh and imo misleading man. Again, I said 4 in the right conditions. It sounds like you want to rate him a 4 or 5. I'd give him 5-6, and if he worked out and got a better haircut he could boost himself 2 points and depending on how hard he goes, maybe more. again; I'm not into dudes so I don't wanna claim to be some sort of authority. You might be completely on point but got that hurt ME to read and I disagree. Hey man, being attractive or not is harsh. I ultimately said below average and I gave points about how its not that big a deal. Youre going too far in saying he could just become an 8 in the face. That is legitimately handsome. Honestly, fuck the law of averages, a lot of guys just arent that good looking before you factor in charisma and personality in person. I stand by my opinion and I said I wasnt trying to be a dick. --- I am basically am I. Well, basically. <cite>masticatingman posted [p:896339544] in Am I even ... [t:76333762]...</cite> <quote><cite>Very_Unreliable posted...</cite> <quote><cite>masticatingman posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Very_Unreliable posted...</cite> <quote><cite>masticatingman posted...</cite> <quote>Well, I could have just said no like other posters. I said 3-4, which is the same as saying below average. I gave plenty of positive takeaways too.</quote> No you condemned him to a 3, which I'd reserve for some pretty mortally ugly people. 1-3 is generally agreed upon to be ugly...4-6 is avg...7-10 is attractive... I wouldn't say this guy is categorically ugly, then again I'm a straight guy. Nothing wrong with saying your opinion but I'm disagreeing and I think it's harsh and imo misleading man.</quote> Again, I said 4 in the right conditions. It sounds like you want to rate him a 4 or 5.</quote> I'd give him 5-6, and if he worked out and got a better haircut he could boost himself 2 points and depending on how hard he goes, maybe more. again; I'm not into dudes so I don't wanna claim to be some sort of authority. You might be completely on point but got that hurt ME to read and I disagree.</quote> Hey man, being attractive or not is harsh. I ultimately said below average and I gave points about how its not that big a deal. Youre going too far in saying he could just become an 8 in the face. That is legitimately handsome. Honestly, fuck the law of averages, a lot of guys just arent that good looking before you factor in charisma and personality in person. I stand by my opinion and I said I wasnt trying to be a dick. --- I am basically am I. Well, basically. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1