LogFAQs > #896034067

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, Database 2 ( 09.16.2017-02.21.2018 ), DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Man cleans graffiti from his building; ordered to pay "artists" $6.7M
Newhopes 02/13/18 8:20:52 PM #44:	sktgamer_13dude posted... Read this earlier. The judge decided to make him pay because he painted over them before the previous ruling came in place. There was like a law that if the art attracted people or something like that, that you needed a permit before painting over it. The guy painted over it before he got the permit (which he did get btw) and thats why the judge ruled in favor of the artist. But continue to get upset because you dont understand the laws. Who gives two fs about that, this is infringement of property rights and gives free reign to vandals to vandalise any property they want. <cite>Newhopes posted [p:896034067] in Man cleans... [t:76316327]...</cite> <quote><cite>sktgamer_13dude posted...</cite> <quote>Read this earlier. The judge decided to make him pay because he painted over them before the previous ruling came in place. There was like a law that if the art attracted people or something like that, that you needed a permit before painting over it. The guy painted over it before he got the permit (which he did get btw) and thats why the judge ruled in favor of the artist. But continue to get upset because you dont understand the laws.</quote> Who gives two fs about that, this is infringement of property rights and gives free reign to vandals to vandalise any property they want.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1