his points might have carried a bit more weight if his free speech was being threatened in the first place
he's also called for the mass firing of other academics, which is incredibly ironic considering the grounds on which he thought his free speech was being threatened
Peterson is against compelled speech, he's not defending free speech in that particular case
also a non-issue. compelled speech wasn't at all relevant to the conversation until he somehow got it into his head that it was
it really depends on how the law interprets the anti-hate speech bill. i don't think pronoun usage has ever even come up in a court ruling. until it does we won't know if his worries are justified or not.
I don't know who the "we" in your sentence is referring to, but I know 100% that his worries were unjustified ---