LogFAQs > #895323025

The Great Muta 22 posted...

Nomadic View posted...

You seriously think thats a good argument?

Are you ok with law enforcement submitting material that law enforcement knows is false when they apply for a warrant? Even in part? Do you think that is an acceptable practice?

Ill await your subsequent dodging of the question and deflection.

The dossier isn't completely false, nor do you have any proof of it being so. Again, the book Clinton Cash has been used in these situations, which is also full of inaccuracies. I'm not pretending to know what was entirely presented to the FISC for the warrant, but the implication in this that these were the only things used when the application process is 50-60 pages, and which multiple people have said that this memo isn't the entirety of the information, it's irresponsible to assume these were the only things used. And when Carter Page has had these issues since 2013 and four different directors from both political parties have signed off on it, I expect they had far more information than Nunes presented.

Youre completely dodging the question, just as I said you would.

I dont care if they used other material. They used the dossier that they knew was false. Are you ok with that as a practice? Are you ok with law enforcement using material they know is false when they secure a warrant?

After you deflect again Ill ask this question again. Save us both the time and just say that you will not answer that question.

If it makes you feel any better Ill answer it first. No, law enforcement should not use material, even in part, that they know is false when attempting to secure a warrant. Your turn.
---

{}\\{}(o){}\\//{}//=\\{})){}(< \\//{}{{-{}//\\{}
{}xxxxxxxx{};;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;>