LogFAQs > #895308333

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, Database 2 ( 09.16.2017-02.21.2018 ), DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Poll for Americans: Do you support a ban on firearms? (except police/military)
gbpxl 02/02/18 10:31:41 AM #35:	darkjedilink posted... gbpxl posted... Anarchy_Juiblex posted... Firearms kill less people than smoking cigarettes. Cigarettes provide less benefit to society than firearms. If you can't justify a cigarette ban, which would be a prohibition that would actually work. Stay the fuck off my guns. Cigarettes are different. When a cigarette kills, it only kills the person who bought the cigarette. When a gun kills, it kills everyone around the person who bought the gun. Wow. So much fail. Like, do you not know what second-hand smoke does? Just as lethal as actually smoking. And if buying a gun is so deadly, gangbangers wouldn't exist. second smoke is less deadly than a mass shooting... I can't believe I even have to say that LOL... <cite>gbpxl posted [p:895308333] in Poll for A... [t:76273388]...</cite> <quote><cite>darkjedilink posted...</cite> <quote><cite>gbpxl posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Anarchy_Juiblex posted...</cite> <quote>Firearms kill less people than smoking cigarettes. Cigarettes provide less benefit to society than firearms. If you can't justify a cigarette ban, which would be a prohibition that would actually work. Stay the fuck off my guns.</quote> Cigarettes are different. When a cigarette kills, it only kills the person who bought the cigarette. When a gun kills, it kills everyone around the person who bought the gun.</quote> Wow. So much fail. Like, do you not know what second-hand smoke does? Just as lethal as actually smoking. And if buying a gun is so deadly, gangbangers wouldn't exist.</quote> second smoke is less deadly than a mass shooting... I can't believe I even have to say that LOL...</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1