Because earlier you were talking about a day when we wouldnt kill animals. Which is why I said humans will never stop eating meat or hunting.
Trying to pick apart each thing I say makes it sound like you have nothing important to say. Just like when I used the word instant. You knew exactly what I was saying yet you harped on it for the literal meaning. Its bizzare and weakens your actual argument
Socially the acceptability of killing and eating animals is likely to change, even within our lifetimes. That's what I was conveying. People will still eat those things and still hunt. If it's fewer then awesome! Things are trending year over year to more vegetarian lifestyles. Openly discussing becoming vegetarian/vegan helps this progression.
Instant death is an immediate end of consciousness and ability to feel pain, fear, suffering, etc. I find the distinction important. However, I also deal with (unfortunately) dying or dead animals in my work. Quick and instant make a world of difference. Quick does beat slaughterhouses. It's just also not an instant death. Deal with enough animals suffering and you may find this distinction important as well.
You cant jump on my phrasing of words if youre also not going to be 100% clear. You phrased it in a way for all killing to stop. My response was a natural answer to that
And you have no clue the kinds of things Ive seen with animals in pain so I clearly know the distinction, but lets be real here. The is a gaming message board. Things are typed at a fast pace. You knew exactly what I was saying and you were arguing just to argue
Friendo I don't think humans will completely stop killing humans or nonhuman animals. I didn't suggest that. I would like that very much. But I do think killing being the norm and acceptable can and will change.
What I said about killing was this:
The point others are making is there no humane killing. That's an oxymoron. A more humane way to reach an inhumane end.
It seems that you came in here to start it with vegans...
Right...
Millennials was the first person to respond to me and even though we didnt talk long he seemed to be a pretty collective guy who actually wanted to discuss something
Then you asked the condescending question do I even hunt and took the word instant at its most literal meaning.
You wanted to argue just to argue. Nothing you originally said added anything to the previous conversation. Something you also seemed to have a problem with
Buddy you keep replying to me to start shit, please tell me how I like to argue ---
