LogFAQs > #894923759

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, Database 2 ( 09.16.2017-02.21.2018 ), DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Tim Burton's Batman movies were really damn good. (Probably Spoilers)
Skye Reynolds 01/27/18 6:10:08 PM #41:	pegusus123456 posted... What are you talking about? Max Shreck isn't a minor character, he's arguably the main villain of the movie. I don't see him on the film's poster. I see the bat, the cat, and the penguin. He's the bad guy who sets things in motion, but much of the time he's playing a bizarre inversion of a damsel in distress. They padded out his role because he was Christopher Walken or because he was originally Harvey Dent and they were setting him up as Two-Face in the next film. Either way, two adversaries were enough. Shreck should've been a minor character. Like I said, Walken could've played a bad guy in the third film. <cite>Skye Reynolds posted [p:894923759] in Tim Burton... [t:76243228]...</cite> <quote><cite>pegusus123456 posted...</cite> <quote>What are you talking about? Max Shreck isn't a minor character, he's arguably the main villain of the movie.</quote> I don't see him on the film's poster. I see the bat, the cat, and the penguin. He's the bad guy who sets things in motion, but much of the time he's playing a bizarre inversion of a damsel in distress. They padded out his role because he was Christopher Walken or because he was originally Harvey Dent and they were setting him up as Two-Face in the next film. Either way, two adversaries were enough. Shreck should've been a minor character. Like I said, Walken could've played a bad guy in the third film.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1