LogFAQs > #894826779

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, Database 2 ( 09.16.2017-02.21.2018 ), DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Stanley Kubrick never made a bad film, who comes close?
Dash_Harber 01/26/18 3:32:58 AM #41:	MabusIncarnate posted... My first thought Didn't he recently do a few so-so attempts to get back into Hollywood? Edge of Darkness, Get the Gringo and Blood Father come to mind. I only saw the former, though. MabusIncarnate posted... I don't think i've seen anything from him I didn't love. The World's End is a phenomenal, and underrated film. I couldn't agree more. It was great. I think it's my least favourite film in the trilogy, but that means basically nothing because even the worse in a series of amazing films can still be amazing in its own right. <cite>Dash_Harber posted [p:894826779] in Stanley Ku... [t:76237963]...</cite> <quote><cite>MabusIncarnate posted...</cite> <quote>My first thought</quote> Didn't he recently do a few so-so attempts to get back into Hollywood? Edge of Darkness, Get the Gringo and Blood Father come to mind. I only saw the former, though. <cite>MabusIncarnate posted...</cite> <quote> I don't think i've seen anything from him I didn't love. The World's End is a phenomenal, and underrated film.</quote> I couldn't agree more. It was great. I think it's my least favourite film in the trilogy, but that means basically nothing because even the worse in a series of amazing films can still be amazing in its own right.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1