LogFAQs > #894150972

ChromaticAngel posted...

1. The complaint is literally pointless. It's 2-scoops-of-ice-cream tier bullshit.
2. People should have been smart enough to know that Trump would not have been given "too much food" in the first place by the pond caretakers.
3. The footage is a single continuous cut. Project Veritas literally chopped up interview footage to mix and match answers to different questions to make it look like Planned Parenthood was auctioning off baby body parts. This made it look like he "overfed fish" except you never saw the fucking food come out of the bowl so for all I know it could have been fucking empty at the time he turned it upside down or maybe only a few seeds left that he couldn't get out with the scoop.

1. Agreed, it is pointless. Which makes CNN's lie all the more pathetic.
2. They should have been, but they weren't.
3. Editing a video specifically to mislead people is a lie regardless of the specific way the video is edited. CNN crops Abe out of the shot, and Veritas cuts out parts of sentences. There's no relevant difference; each is an edit made to lie to people.
---

Freedom is the right to tell people what they do not want to hear.
-George Orwell