LogFAQs > #894123448

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, Database 2 ( 09.16.2017-02.21.2018 ), DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	It's almost a year later. What are some Hitler-ish things Trump did?
FigureOfSpeech 01/15/18 7:00:14 PM #76:	Mal_Fet posted... FigureOfSpeech posted... Mal_Fet posted... FigureOfSpeech posted... Who called him Hitler? Citation needed. https://www.washingtonpost.com/posteverything/wp/2016/09/13/dont-compare-donald-trump-to-adolf-hitler-it-belittles- hitler/ You said "we all" How does that cite anything "we all" do? It's starting to get annoying how "you all" will take all statements in the most literal possible sense in order to win points in an argument; points nobody cares about because the principle remains. Trump was widely regarded as Hitler by many left-leaning public figures, and it's pretty embarrassing for them (and you, presumably, since you're defending them) that Trump is actually unlike Hitler in more ways than Hillary Clinton (the candidate they supported) is. I don't care what a small handful of of random people think. They don't speak for me, nor do they speak for any group I associate with. I don't support Hillary Clinton and I'm a registered Independent. I don't care how many arbitrary points I earn while arguing or how those points are distributed or who decides how many I earn for each thing I say, so I agree with you about "points nobody cares about." What? Is an argument a competition? Am I arguing in the hopes I have a good enough record to make the argument playoffs? No. That's asinine. I take you all/we all/everyone literally, yeah... when people are foolish enough to assume I'm spoken for by others or other groups just because I happen to agree or disagree with a specific premise. I'm not defending "them." Who even are they? Cher? A Mexican president? Glenn Beck (lmfao that guy is a fucking tool)? I don't even know what the ADL even is. At least you said presumably. You are capable of learning things. Before, you would have just accused me of defending them without using "presumably" as an escape plan. I do appreciate that and respect you for it. Basically, what you are doing is saying "random well known(?) people on the left said Trump is Hitler. They are anti-Trump. If you are anti-Trump, you agree with and share their sentiments and are just as accountable for their words as they are because I've labeled you the same as I've labeled them... so now, because their words are now also your words, I expect you to try and back them up or admit that you personally were in the wrong for me having attributed their words to you which is your fault for being against the person they are against." That is not any form of logic. It's... I don't even know... Psychologically unhealthy. --- Place-holder sig because new phone and old sigs not saved :/ <cite>FigureOfSpeech posted [p:894123448] in It's almos... [t:76205099]...</cite> <quote><cite>Mal_Fet posted...</cite> <quote><cite>FigureOfSpeech posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Mal_Fet posted...</cite> <quote><cite>FigureOfSpeech posted...</cite> <quote>Who called him Hitler? Citation needed.</quote> https://www.washingtonpost.com/posteverything/wp/2016/09/13/dont-compare-donald-trump-to-adolf-hitler-it-belittles- hitler/</quote> You said "we all" How does that cite anything "we all" do?</quote> It's starting to get annoying how "you all" will take all statements in the most literal possible sense in order to win points in an argument; points nobody cares about because the principle remains. Trump was widely regarded as Hitler by many left-leaning public figures, and it's pretty embarrassing for them (and you, presumably, since you're defending them) that Trump is actually unlike Hitler in more ways than Hillary Clinton (the candidate they supported) is.</quote> I don't care what a small handful of of random people think. They don't speak for me, nor do they speak for any group I associate with. I don't support Hillary Clinton and I'm a registered Independent. I don't care how many arbitrary points I earn while arguing or how those points are distributed or who decides how many I earn for each thing I say, so I agree with you about "points nobody cares about." What? Is an argument a competition? Am I arguing in the hopes I have a good enough record to make the argument playoffs? No. That's asinine. I take you all/we all/everyone literally, yeah... when people are foolish enough to assume I'm spoken for by others or other groups just because I happen to agree or disagree with a specific premise. I'm not defending "them." Who even are they? Cher? A Mexican president? Glenn Beck (lmfao that guy is a fucking tool)? I don't even know what the ADL even is. At least you said presumably. You are capable of learning things. Before, you would have just accused me of defending them without using "presumably" as an escape plan. I do appreciate that and respect you for it. Basically, what you are doing is saying "random well known(?) people on the left said Trump is Hitler. They are anti-Trump. If you are anti-Trump, you agree with and share their sentiments and are just as accountable for their words as they are because I've labeled you the same as I've labeled them... so now, because their words are now also your words, I expect you to try and back them up or admit that you personally were in the wrong for me having attributed their words to you which is your fault for being against the person they are against." That is not any form of logic. It's... I don't even know... Psychologically unhealthy. --- Place-holder sig because new phone and old sigs not saved :/</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1