LogFAQs > #893796704

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, Database 2 ( 09.16.2017-02.21.2018 ), DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Why do you think Admiral doesn't support da #MeToo movement?
darkjedilink 01/10/18 7:56:38 PM #45:	CensorErik posted... darkjedilink posted... CensorErik posted... Howl posted... CensorErik posted... @darkjedilink posted... Because #MeToo is the epitome of 'guilty until proven innocent.' Which is the way feminists want it. No, it's women sharing their stories to show just how prevalent this issue really is. Lol. Keep believing the lies. I didn't say I believe them all. In fact, yesterday I outright said I do not believe the claims against Stan Lee. I also don't believe the nonsense about Woody Allen. My point was that the hashtag is more about showing support to each other than it is about destroying lives. But people see what they want, so who knows? If it was about "showing support," how come nobody showed support to the guy who accused Salma Hayek? No, it's about destroying lives in the name of smashing the patriarchy. You want to shape it to fit your skewed view. I won't waste anymore time debating it. You're unlikely to change my mind and vice-versa. Goodnight. You can't explain why nobody supported Salma Hayek's accuser, because you don't want to admit that the only reason he never got support was because he's a dude. Doing so completely undermines your argument. Answer this - how come the only person who's actually presented evidence of their claims (the first person to accuse Democrat Senator Al Franken) was the first woman #MeToo didn't "show support" to? How come so many members of the #MeToo movement DEFENDED Al Franken, if it's all about "showing support" for alleged victims? --- 'It's okay that those gangbangers stole all my personal belongings and cash at gunpoint, cuz they're building a rec center!' - OneTimeBen <cite>darkjedilink posted [p:893796704] in Why do you... [t:76186954]...</cite> <quote><cite>CensorErik posted...</cite> <quote><cite>darkjedilink posted...</cite> <quote><cite>CensorErik posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Howl posted...</cite> <quote><cite>CensorErik posted...</cite> <quote><cite>@darkjedilink posted...</cite> <quote> Because #MeToo is the epitome of 'guilty until proven innocent.' Which is the way feminists want it.</quote> No, it's women sharing their stories to show just how prevalent this issue really is.</quote> Lol. Keep believing the lies.</quote>I didn't say I believe them all. In fact, yesterday I outright said I do not believe the claims against Stan Lee. I also don't believe the nonsense about Woody Allen. My point was that the hashtag is more about showing support to each other than it is about destroying lives. But people see what they want, so who knows?</quote> If it was about "showing support," how come nobody showed support to the guy who accused Salma Hayek? No, it's about destroying lives in the name of smashing the patriarchy.</quote> You want to shape it to fit your skewed view. I won't waste anymore time debating it. You're unlikely to change my mind and vice-versa. Goodnight.</quote> You can't explain why nobody supported Salma Hayek's accuser, because you don't want to admit that the only reason he never got support was because he's a dude. Doing so completely undermines your argument. Answer this - how come the only person who's actually presented evidence of their claims (the first person to accuse Democrat Senator Al Franken) was the first woman #MeToo didn't "show support" to? How come so many members of the #MeToo movement DEFENDED Al Franken, if it's all about "showing support" for alleged victims? --- 'It's okay that those gangbangers stole all my personal belongings and cash at gunpoint, cuz they're building a rec center!' - OneTimeBen</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1