I noticed you ignored commenting on the pure hypocrisy i gave an example of by posting that link to the other topic.
So do you think we should ruin that woman's life too because she "sexually assaulted" someone?
Or do you think the person who got assaulted was somehow in the wrong?
you seem to have trouble understanding the concept of "actions have consequences"
Who was in the wrong? in the example I posted? The "sexual assaulter" or the victim?
Why did some people try to demonize the victim in that situation?
Was him being assaulted the consequence of his actions?
@mario2000 Feel free to deflect again, but I'm genuinely curious who you think was wrong in the situation I posted, or why demonizing one person for sexual assault is "a consequence of their actions" but NOT demonizing a different person for sexual assault is somehow okay?