LogFAQs > #893745330

nicklebro posted...

That's you doing that.

Nope.

nicklebro posted...

Not to mention this all stemmed from you thinking I was defending Dawkins, when I clearly wasn't.

Agree to disagree.

nicklebro posted...

So in turn I took your defense of the trolls who harassed Dawkins and pushed it to the extreme level of you supporting the torture and execution of mentally handicapped death row inmates, and then even further into accusing you of being one of those torturers and enjoying it immensely.

That's not "taking my argument to the extreme" that's making shit up that's not connected to what I said.

:/

nicklebro posted...

So just like you accused me of defending Dawkins and then taking it to the extreme of defending a bigoted rapist, I accused you of delighting in harassing Dawkins and pushed it to the extreme of you enjoying torturing and executing mentally handicapped prisoners. I showed you how absurd your statement was by taking your logic and applying it you.

But there's a logical train between defending one mentally handicapped person for their shitty behavior and defending another mentally handicapped person for their shitty behavior, even if I was wrong in my assessment that that's what you were doing (I wasn't wrong, though).

There's no logical connection between "you like harassing X person" and "You want to torture and murder X person"

You literally made shit up and pretended it was a logical continuation of some other shit.

The question is whether you know what you did or you're actually dimwitted enough to think that you made logical sense in doing so.