LogFAQs > #893741074

sktgamer_13dude posted...

His source and proof is that he was a former mod. Id assume other former mods like a Admiral would corroborate his story.

The only people who think the mods have a bias against them are shitposters who get fair moderations. Are all moderations perfectly fair, next? type moderations? No. But most of them are.

So all moderators are perfectly objective and don't let their own biases affect them? Sorry but that's just too illogical for me to accept.

NibeIungsnarf posted...

Is he deemed legally insane and not responsible for his actions?

You'd probably defend Chris Chan for his violent assaults, self-admitted rape desires and bioted racism/homophobia just because he's autistic.

Idk how many times I have to say I'm not defending him at all.

Lol and Jesus Christ, I'm now guilty of defending bigoted rapists? All because I think that anyone who would do what Dawkins harassers did are quite clearly bad people?

By that logic, you'd probably support legalizing death by torture for mentally handicapped death row inmates and actually volunteer to do the torturing as you got off on inflicting pain on other people.

See how absurd it is to immediately take arguments to their absolute extreme? That's how you sound bro.

Regardless of how wrong Dawkins is/was, which I'm sure he was very wrong, it doesn't in anyway excuse the actions of his harassers. Idk why some of you have such a hard time understanding that one side being wrong doesn't make the other side right.
---

Now you can't call me a sigless user.