just fyi people, Error and Alucard are the kinds of people who believes a statistic can be racist, and that its possible to be racist against muslims (as in racist against a religion), and that thinks peer reviewed journals can be racist
^ literally says this immediately after accusing others of putting words in his mouth.
It is possible to be demeaning to religions and stereotype then. You obviously cannot be racist against a religion.
I mean the main point is he was just putting words in their mouths. "Racism against a religion" is more a semantic issue. Bigotry toward a religion, racism against people from parts of the world that are overwhelmingly Islamic, the intention is clear. "But it is not RACISM, Islam isn't a RACE" is valid, but splitting hairs. It's on the same intellectual level as "nuh uh I know u r but wat am i?"
Yeah, there's no reason to take anything Rika says seriously. Shitposter to the utmost degree.
You can call me whatever you want but you cant call me a liar or incorrect, lmao ---