LogFAQs > #892981340

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, Database 2 ( 09.16.2017-02.21.2018 ), DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Is it worth it to replay Dragon Age: Origins and II before Inquisition?
InfestedAdam 12/27/17 10:52:48 PM #24:	Thank you for the very detailed insight, ParanoidObsessive. Pity the three games don't connect that well. Despite whatever issues I had with Mass Effect 3 kinda making your choices in the first two games not matter, DAII and DA:I seems to take the cake in the regards. ParanoidObsessive posted... (And honestly, the whole "Dragon Age Keep" thing is pure bulls*. They easily could have incorporated Varric's whole prelude and presetting story flags into the game itself akin to how Mass Effect: Genesis worked I thought that was strange as to why that wasn't incorporated into the game. ParanoidObsessive posted... About the only reason I can't say that DA:I is the worst BioWare game ever made is because Mass Effect: Andromeda exists. Funny, I added that to my Origin wishlist since it is also on sale but am hesitant to get it. I might just do it for the gameplay someday and hope the story is at least tolerable. I can't recall if it was you or someone else that blamed the fans for how DA:I and ME:A turned out. In that the developers tried to half-n-half it by doing a new thing while trying to introduce old elements as well. But instead of best of both worlds we get some abomination of the two. I'll admit, after ME3, I wanted more adventures and whatnot with Sheppard but can understand that would just restrict the writers on what they can do. Kinda the same for DA2. Refocusing on the Grey Warden would just limit the writers on where else they can take the story to and with such an enriching world that they've created, it would be a waste to not pursue that other content. --- "You must gather your party before venturing forth" "Go for the eyes Boo! Go for the eyes!" <cite>InfestedAdam posted [p:892981340] in Is it wort... [t:76140655]...</cite> <quote>Thank you for the very detailed insight, ParanoidObsessive. Pity the three games don't connect that well. Despite whatever issues I had with Mass Effect 3 kinda making your choices in the first two games not matter, DAII and DA:I seems to take the cake in the regards. <cite>ParanoidObsessive posted...</cite> <quote>(And honestly, the whole "Dragon Age Keep" thing is pure bulls*. They easily could have incorporated Varric's whole prelude and presetting story flags into the game itself akin to how Mass Effect: Genesis worked</quote> I thought that was strange as to why that wasn't incorporated into the game. <cite>ParanoidObsessive posted...</cite> <quote>About the only reason I can't say that DA:I is the worst BioWare game ever made is because Mass Effect: Andromeda exists.</quote> Funny, I added that to my Origin wishlist since it is also on sale but am hesitant to get it. I might just do it for the gameplay someday and hope the story is at least tolerable. I can't recall if it was you or someone else that blamed the fans for how DA:I and ME:A turned out. In that the developers tried to half-n-half it by doing a new thing while trying to introduce old elements as well. But instead of best of both worlds we get some abomination of the two. I'll admit, after ME3, I wanted more adventures and whatnot with Sheppard but can understand that would just restrict the writers on what they can do. Kinda the same for DA2. Refocusing on the Grey Warden would just limit the writers on where else they can take the story to and with such an enriching world that they've created, it would be a waste to not pursue that other content. --- "You must gather your party before venturing forth" "Go for the eyes Boo! Go for the eyes!"</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1