LogFAQs > #892732950

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, Database 2 ( 09.16.2017-02.21.2018 ), DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Appeals court rules against latest travel ban.
ThePieReborn 12/23/17 8:25:50 AM #12:	Bullet_Wing posted... ThePieReborn posted... TheCyborgNinja posted... Didnt the Supreme Court already say it was okay? Or did I go insane? They have lifted the injunction until they officially decide. Yeah, they basically just kicked the can down the road a bit more. They didn't make any actual decision. I get the impression that the Court is predisposed towards allowing the ban (President's "broad and generally undefined powers over foreign affairs" and whatnot), but wants to see justifications in the opposite direction. I figure how tweets and other statements will be leveraged in construing the context of the ban will be outcome determinative regarding constitutional violations. frozenshock posted... I guess we can add a court to Trump's dark list He's already been ragging on the Ninth Circuit, as has every other halfwit with a bone to pick with them librul activists. :P --- Party leader, passive-aggressive doormat, pasta eater extraordinaire! <cite>ThePieReborn posted [p:892732950] in Appeals co... [t:76128225]...</cite> <quote><cite>Bullet_Wing posted...</cite> <quote><cite>ThePieReborn posted...</cite> <quote><cite>TheCyborgNinja posted...</cite> <quote>Didnt the Supreme Court already say it was okay? Or did I go insane?</quote> They have lifted the injunction until they officially decide.</quote> Yeah, they basically just kicked the can down the road a bit more. They didn't make any actual decision.</quote> I get the impression that the Court is predisposed towards allowing the ban (President's "broad and generally undefined powers over foreign affairs" and whatnot), but wants to see justifications in the opposite direction. I figure how tweets and other statements will be leveraged in construing the context of the ban will be outcome determinative regarding constitutional violations. <cite>frozenshock posted...</cite> <quote>I guess we can add a court to Trump's dark list</quote> He's already been ragging on the Ninth Circuit, as has every other halfwit with a bone to pick with them librul activists. :P --- Party leader, passive-aggressive doormat, pasta eater extraordinaire!</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1