LogFAQs > #892624656

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, Database 2 ( 09.16.2017-02.21.2018 ), DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Survivor: Heroes/Healers/Hustlers Discussion Topic 5: Spoiler-free finale
eaedwards6400 12/21/17 10:38:01 AM #415:	I agee, Chrissy had a good FTC. I think it was that performance that got her the 2 votes. I think at this early spot I would probably have Ben closer to Bob than Mike. Bob only got in because Sugar is nuts. Ben got the twist as where Mike and Fabio had a legit way of winning and in winning immunity challenges. If you take immunity wins as a negative then why even have them. Give me Mike > Michele ( I wouldn't call her strategically unaware she was in the alliance with Cydney and Aubry after all) > Fabio > Nat White > Amber > Ben > Bob. At at least had moments of control and the idols were his own doing I feel Bob was clueless for most of it. --- GameFlux: Unofficial GameFAQs board browser <cite>eaedwards6400 posted [p:892624656] in Survivor: ... [t:76118835]...</cite> <quote>I agee, Chrissy had a good FTC. I think it was that performance that got her the 2 votes. I think at this early spot I would probably have Ben closer to Bob than Mike. Bob only got in because Sugar is nuts. Ben got the twist as where Mike and Fabio had a legit way of winning and in winning immunity challenges. If you take immunity wins as a negative then why even have them. Give me Mike > Michele ( I wouldn't call her strategically unaware she was in the alliance with Cydney and Aubry after all) > Fabio > Nat White > Amber > Ben > Bob. At at least had moments of control and the idols were his own doing I feel Bob was clueless for most of it. --- GameFlux: Unofficial GameFAQs board browser</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1