LogFAQs > #891825916

scar the 1 posted...

I'm not saying your argument isn't sound because I disagree, I'm saying it isn't sound because your premise is wrong. To demonstrate this I give you Admiral's argument as an example of a sound argument that I disagree with.

An argument being logical is a valid argument. A sound arguments is one whose premises are true. Your premise, that it doesn't matter because in the context of the story the kiss is fine, isn't true because young kids can't grasp context well.

As for why this debate arose, well there's this whole big group of women who feel like there are certain structures that help men do what they want, and that protect them from repercussions. You can deny those structures if you want. Have fun.

Actually you're trying to put words in my mouth and come up with a "premise" I never came close to mentioning. My actual premise is that this story is not dangerous or harmful to little kids, it's been around forever and has never been an issue until this lady made a fuss. Again, your argument fails because actual reality has already proven that there's nothing wrong with children reading this story. There's no reason to hide it from them. This is why your argument fails, it assumes there's an issue when actual reality has already proven that to be untrue

Lol and you've already admitted I'm right without knowing it. This issue didn't arise because there was a negative consequence from children reading this story, it came about because some women have a problem with it. You literally just said that.

So until you can actually prove that this story damages children, your argument is irrational and baseless. Sorry, but you're just flat out wrong here, and reality is what you're arguing against.
---

Now you can't call me a sigless user.